SBR
GUIDELINES
The
Separately Budgeted Research program is designed to support faculty
research and other scholarly activities which are within the area(s)
of faculty memberís current or anticipated teaching responsibilities.
Consonant with the Universityís Institutional Plan, this year
the SBR Committee is also seeking to support innovative projects that
involve instructional technology.
Awards are available to full-time faculty and are based on the availability
of funds for the particular research year. Award recipients are required
to submit a report by the end of the academic year in which the award
was received.
SBR
funds can be used to support:
- projects
that are designed to support the Universityís mission;
- projects
involving instructional technology;
- projects
promoting effective teaching strategies for active
learning in the university classroom;
- projects
associated with concerns of the local community
or the State of New Jersey;
- projects
involving students in the research experience;
- cooperative
projects involving another university or agency.
SBR
funds can be for any of the following activities:
-
released
time for faculty engaged in SBR activity;
-
hiring
temporary clerical and technical workers who
assist on SBR funded projects;
-
limited
necessary and relevant supplies and equipment; and
-
limited
necessary and relevant travel requests.
SBR
funds may not be used to support the following activities:
The
2003-2004
SBR Review Committee
JOANNE
Z. BRUNO, J.D., Chair,
Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs
ANTOINETTE
ELLIS-WILLIAMS
Director/Assistant Professor, Lee Hagan Africana Center
KEVIN
MALLEY
Assistant Professor, Fire Science
JILL
LEWIS
Professor, Literacy Education
JOHN
O'BRIEN
Associate Professor, Geoscience
LEONARD
NASS
Associate Professor, Business Administration
ROSELYN
U. OBI
Associate Professor, Elementary/Secondary Education
ADELA
MARTINEZ
Assistant Professor, English/ESL
Basic
criteria for evaluating proposals:
-
clarity
of problem definition and objectives (includes statement
of problem, rationale, specific and measurable objectives);
-
adequacy
and appropriateness of proposed methodology
(includes timetable and activities designed to meet objectives);
-
feasibility
of accomplishing the objectives within grant year;
-
qualifications
of applicant to undertake the proposed project
(includes statement of qualifications and/or current resume/vitae);
and
-
statement
of benefits to the University and/or community, if ..applicable.
Applications
may be rejected for any of the following reasons:
-
incomplete
proposal
-
poorly
written proposal
-
exorbitant
budget request, despite good proposal
(See Average Award Y 2002-2003)
-
applicant
is not a full-time faculty member
-
project
purpose is inconsistent with those outlined
in the application instructions
-
budget
request appears to be solely for equipment
-
proposed
project is not feasible for budget request period
-
applicant
failed to submit report for previously funded project(s)
-
proposal
does not include appropriate methodology to accomplish
stated goals
Based
on the availability of funds for the next fiscal year (2003-04), full-time
faculty are invited to apply for research grants. The average grant
for 2002-03 was $2500 and they ranged from a low of $1500 to a high
of $4600. 21 of the 27 applicants received either full or partial funding
of their grant requests during 2002-03.
SBR
applications are available in Academic Affairs, Hepburn 309 in the semester
Fall or click below for our online version. Deadline for completed applications
is January and only one project per applicant may be submitted per grant
year.
Contact
for Information:
Associate Vice President for Academic Affairs, ext. 2033.